Logo Museum
Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Master Name Index
What's new in the site
Mining
Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians
War Service information
Disasters
Disaster Reports
Disaster Report Text
Disaster Report Name Index
UK Disaster Report Text
UK Disaster Report Name Index
Inquest Texts
Names of those killed
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry
On this day ...

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out
Former www.pitwork.net web site

Index to site

Contact and address details

Share Page with Social Media

Share on Facebook

Share with Reddit

Share on Delicious

Reports Prev Page Return to Index Next Page Reports
/   \

VII. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS

81. Summarising the results of the Inquiry, I consider it established that :–

(1) The explosion originated with the firing of a charge of sheathed permitted explosive in a shot-hole drilled in the roof and directed towards the waste behind and immediately contiguous to the No. 2 Dip longwall machine-cut conveyor face in the Six Quarters Seam.

(2) Before the shot-hole was charged it had not been examined for breaks running along or across, contrary to the requirements of Clause 6 (d) of Part II of the principal Explosives in Coal Mines Order.

(3) The shot-hole passed through a roof break or breaks and the inner end of the hole either made contact with, or was in very dose proximity to, a bed-separation cavity containing inflammable gas which was continuous with an accumulation of explosive gas in the contiguous waste or goaf.

(4) The firing of the shot ignited the gas in the bed-separation cavity.

(5) The gas in the cavity burned for a short interval of time and the flame travelled along the cavity until it reached the explosive mixture in the waste, causing a firedamp explosion.

(6) The flame of the explosion traversed several working faces and nearly 2,000 yards of roadway, including several inbye conveyor roads, about 60 yards of the main return airway and nearly half a mile of the main intake haulage road.

(7) The explosion was marked by few signs of extreme violence.

(8) The initial explosion was almost certainly one of firedamp only. The blast from this initial explosion raised a dust cloud ahead of it and as the explosion travelled on its path the nature of the combustible mixture gradually changed from firedamp-and-air through firedamp-coal-dust-and-air to practically coal-dust-and-air alone, before the flame was finally extinguished by excess of stone dust in the dust cloud.

(9) The excess of coal-dust in the dust cloud was mainly derived from under the roadway conveyor structures and from the recently deposited top layer along the whole length of the inbye conveyor roads, while the stone dust was mainly derived from the main intake haulage road. This stone dust was projected ahead of the coal dust blown from the inbye conveyor roads and did not contribute to the extinction of the explosion until the flame had travelled nearly half a mile outbye along the haulage road.

 

Prev Page Return to Top of Page Next Page

 

mail
Mail:
Webmaster
Back
Back
Home
Home
Open Government Licence   Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Copyright © 1999-2024 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 31 Dec 2022

Privacy Policy
 
Terms & Conditions
 
Search
Search
Print
Print