Logo Museum
Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Master Name Index
What's new in the site
Mining
Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians
War Service information
Disasters
Disaster Reports
Names of those killed
Name Index (Local!)
Name Index (Rest of UK)
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry
On this day ...

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out
Former www.pitwork.net web site

Index to site

Contact and address details

Share Page with Social Media

Share on Facebook

Share with Reddit

Share on Delicious

  Disasters - Names Return to Index Disasters - Names  
/ \
Date:  1925
Colliery:  South Hetton
Company:  
Cause:  Fall of stone
Lives Lost:  1
Category:  

Description

I have already pointed out that the use of a safety contrivance is compulsory, in all cases without exception, for withdrawing timber from the waste or goaf ; elsewhere a safety contrivance should be used whenever its use is possible, and sufficient temporary supports should be set so as to secure the safety of the persons employed. At South Hetton Colliery, Durham, a stoneman was killed by a fall of roof while assisting to alter the position of supports at a junction. Deceased and two other stonemen had to move two crossing baulks 12 in. inbye. The two baulks were 6 in. apart and upon them rested the ends of six baulks, which supported the roof of the roadway. The roof was known to be bad. The first crossing baulk was moved and reset. A middle prop was then set under the second crossing baulk and the end props removed. While deceased was using a mell to loosen the middle prop, a fall of roof occurred, measuring 12 ft. by 15 ft. and 5 ft. 6 in. thick, and one man was killed outright. Eight baulks were canted out. If, as ought to have been done, temporary props had been set under each of the six baulks resting on the crossing baulks, or, if a safety contrivance had been used for withdrawal of supports, this fatality would probably have been prevented.

Source: 

1925 Mines Inspectors Report



Fatalities



 
0 of 1 names found

 

Return Return   Return Return to Top

mail
Mail:
Webmaster
Back
Back
Home
Home
Open Government Licence   Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Copyright © 1999-2024 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 31 Dec 2022

Privacy Policy
 
Terms & Conditions
 
Search
Search
Print
Print