Logo Museum
Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Master Name Index
What's new in the site
Mining
Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians
War Service information
Disasters
Disaster Reports
Names of those killed
Name Index (Local!)
Name Index (Rest of UK)
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry
On this day ...

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out
Former www.pitwork.net web site

Index to site

Contact and address details

Share Page with Social Media

Share on Facebook

Share with Reddit

Share on Delicious

  Disasters - Names Return to Index Disasters - Names  
/ \
Date:  7th March 1876
Colliery:  Woodend No. 10
Company:  James Bain and Co.
Cause:  Shaft accident
Lives Lost:  1
Category:  

Description

Metalliferous Mines.

Fatal Accidents.

Accident No. 6 in the list. Deceased was acting as bottomer at an "eye" or mid-landing in a shaft. Some workmen had been drawn up the shaft, and two more were waiting at the eye for the same purpose, at which time deceased was standing by a laden bogey which he had brought from the workings. It was no part of his duty as bottomer to give the signals for the men to ascend, the usual plan being for the men to do so themselves. Immediately after the cage began to ascend, deceased was seen pushing the bogey towards the shaft, the supposition being that he had forgotten all about the cage having been taken up with the men in it. He continued to push until the bogey fell into the shaft and he along with it. In all cases where men are ascending the shaft, it should be the duty of the bottomer, or, in his absence, some person appointed for the purpose, to give the signals and to attend near the shaft until the man have safely reached the surface. Had this been deceased's duty he could not possibly have forgotten that the cage was not in position to receive the bogey. There was not any "fencing" at this opening as required by General Rule 7, section 44, of the Metalliferous Mines Act. If there had been a proper fence the accident could not have happened. In consequence of this violation of the Act, and by your permission, I summoned the owners, Messrs. James Bain, John Simpson, and another before the magistrates at Whitehaven, who having heard the case, and there being practically no defence offered, inflicted a fine of £2 inclusive of costs, the costs I understood being £1 19s. 6d., leaving the fine sixpence. The magistrates who heard the case were John Thompson, Esquire, and William Jackson, Esquire, and beyond this it is probably not necessary for me to make any further remark.

Source: 

1876 Mines Inspectors Report (C. 1734), Newcastle-on-Tyne District by James Willis, H.M. Inspector of Mines, Page: 257 Where to find this report



Fatalities



Individual page 

Lynch, William, aged 18, Trailer, Acting as bottomer pushed a laden bogey into the eye after the cage had been raised. Fell to the bottom, 12 fathoms.

 
All names found
 

Those names marked with image, have a web page providing individual details of the accident, the page may also include a photograph of the deceased. Click on the image symbol next to the name to see the web page.

 

Return Return   Return Return to Top

mail
Mail:
Webmaster
Back
Back
Home
Home
Open Government Licence   Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Copyright © 1999-2024 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 31 Dec 2022

Privacy Policy
 
Terms & Conditions
 
Search
Search
Print
Print