logo Museum
Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Master Name Index
What's new in the site
Donate to support the Museum
Mining
Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians
War Service information
Disasters
Disaster Reports
Names of those killed
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry
On this day ...

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out
Former www.pitwork.net web site

Index to site

Contact and address details

Share Page with Social Media

Share on Facebook

Share with Reddit

Share on Delicious

  Individual Details   Individual Details  
 


Samuel Ackrigg

Age:   25
Died:   22nd Jul 1901
Accident:   22nd Jul 1901
Year Born:   abt. 1876
Colliery:   Plumpton (Limestone)
Company:   North Lonsdale Iron and Steel Co., Ltd.
Occupation:   Quarryman
Notes:  
About half a charge of 950 lbs. of powder had been put into a deep hole when the explosion occurred [Inspection made & inquest attended]
Buried:   [not known]
Category:  

Description

No. 242. This accident occurred at the Plumpton Limestone Quarry, in Lancashire, and occasioned the death of two men, Richard Balderstone and Samuel Ackrigg.

A big blast was being prepared, by which it was hoped to dislodge about 2,000 tons of rock. The hole was 23½ feet deep, and the men had been working at it for about a fortnight, gradually deepening and enlarging it, and preparing for the final charge.

The last time of firing, prior to the explosion by which the men were killed, was at 9 a.m., about four hours before the accident occurred. On that occasion a charge of 200 lbs. of powder had been fired by means of the ordinary tape fuse. The hole had then been left to cool. Shortly after one o'clock, Thistlethwaite (the shot-firer and deputy foreman), accompanied by Ackrigg and two other men, returned to put in the powder for the final charge.

Previous to this, however, Thistlethwaite had examined a long iron scraper which had been put in the hole immediately after the last firing. He found that the scraper was quite cold, and he then tested further for fire by throwing a handful of powder down the hole. This having no effect he concluded that all was safe for proceeding with the work of charging.

It was intended to put in 950 lbs. of powder for this final blast, and 500 lbs. had been inserted when the explosion occurred.

A further quantity of 350 lbs. of powder, part of the intended charge, which had been brought up to the place in linen bags, also exploded.

Thistlethwaite and Ackrigg were hurled violently against the quarry face, the latter being killed instantly, whilst the former only lived a few minutes, and was never conscious after the accident.

The other two men who were assisting in the work of charging had fortunately gone into the quarry bottom for materials and thereby escaped injury.

No one actually saw the accident, but from the evidence it was quite clear that during the operation of charging, Thistlethwaite was using a long iron rod for the purpose of "feeling" the powder, and thereby learning to what extent it was filling up the hole.

I did not, by any means, consider that the evidence proved that the use of the iron rod had caused the accident, yet its use was so clearly a contravention of Special Rule No. 9, which provides that — "No iron or steel tool shall be used for charging or stemming a hole with any explosive," that I obtained your permission to institute proceedings against the owners and manager of the quarry for the offence just mentioned, and also for contravening Special Rule No. 8, which includes the following provision

"All explosives shall be conveyed from the magazine to the quarry, and kept till used in secure packages, so made and closed as to prevent any escape of the explosives and any danger from sparks."

The case was heard at the Ulverston Police Court on the 12th of September, 1901.

There was no defence, and the owners and managers were fined £5 for each offence, or a total of £20 and costs.


Mines Inspectors Report Entry


Sources
  • 1901 Mines Inspectors Report (Cd 1062), Newcastle District (No. 3) by J. L. Hedley, H.M. Inspector of Mines, Page: 63 Where to find this report
  • 1901 Mines Inspectors Report (Cd 1062), Newcastle District (No. 3) by J. L. Hedley, H.M. Inspector of Mines, Page: 67, Accident Number: 242 Where to find this report

Researchers

If you are researching Samuel Ackrigg (e.g. for family tree purposes) and you would like to hear from others with the same interest then please complete the details in the following form. We will show the information you provide on this page so that you can be contacted.

What is your name?
What is your contact email address?
What is your research interest?

 

Return Return   Return Return to Top

 

mail
Mail:
Webmaster
Back
Back
Home
Home
Open Government Licence   Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Copyright © 1999-2024 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 31 Jan 2023

Privacy Policy
 
Terms & Conditions
 
Search
Search
Print
Print