logo Museum
Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Master Name Index
What's new in the site
Donate to support the Museum
Mining
Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians
War Service information
Disasters
Disaster Reports
Names of those killed
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry
On this day ...

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out
Former www.pitwork.net web site

Index to site

Contact and address details

Share Page with Social Media

Share on Facebook

Share with Reddit

Share on Delicious

  Individual Details   Individual Details  
 


Samuel Crosbir

Age:   50
Died:   13th Mar 1871
Accident:   13th Mar 1871
Year Born:   abt. 1821
Colliery:   Common
Company:   William Walker
Occupation:   Collier
Notes:  
Crushed between the cage and the shaft, caused by misuderstanding of signals
Buried:   [not known]
Category:  

Description

Accident No. 5, schedule No. 1, was occasioned by the cage being raised unexpectedly.

The pit where this unfortunate occurrence took place had just been sunk, and the deceased and his neighbour had been engaged forming a water lodgement and other preparatory work near to the pit bottom. I understand that on the morning of the accident they had finished a night shift and had signalled to be raised to the surface. As explained by the engineman he was engaged at the boiler fires at the time the signal was given, but a few minutes after he went in to the engine house, and not being aware that the signal was to raise men, he started the engine and after "backing" it raised the cage.

The deceased's neighbour, who was at the pit bottom, reports that the signal made was to raise men, and as the ordinary back signal arrangement had not been completed, it was the practice for the engineman, before lifting away the cage, to slightly raise it, and afterwards set it back, which was the acknowledged signal for men to get on to the cage. In this case the deceased and his neighbour when they saw the cage being set back attempted to get on to it, but it was not put back sufficiently, and they did not succeed in getting quite on. The deceased got crushed between the cage and the shaft, but his neighbour escaped by throwing himself back out of the cage.

The defect in this case lay in the back signal, and if a right back signal had been in use, in all probability the accident would not have happened.


Sources
  • 1871 Mines Inspectors Report (C. 653), Scotland, West District by William Alexander, H.M. Inspector of Mines, Page: 151 Where to find this report
  • 1871 Mines Inspectors Report (C. 653), Scotland, West District by William Alexander, H.M. Inspector of Mines, Page: 155, Accident Number: 5 Where to find this report

Researchers

If you are researching Samuel Crosbir (e.g. for family tree purposes) and you would like to hear from others with the same interest then please complete the details in the following form. We will show the information you provide on this page so that you can be contacted.

What is your name?
What is your contact email address?
What is your research interest?

 

Return Return   Return Return to Top

 

mail
Mail:
Webmaster
Back
Back
Home
Home
Open Government Licence   Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Copyright © 1999-2024 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 30 Apr 2023

Privacy Policy
 
Terms & Conditions
 
Search
Search
Print
Print