Museum Entrance Museum
Museum
Friends of Durham Mining Museum
Events Calendar
e-Books and Books for sale
Photograph Gallery
Document Archive
Main Document Archive
Newspaper Articles
Local Record Extracts
D.M.A. Document Archive
Transactions of I.M.E.
Miners' Welfare
N.C.B. Archive
The Colliery Engineer
The Colliery Engineer - Main Index
The Colliery Engineer - Subject Index
The Colliery Guardian
Mine & Quarry Engineering
Mining Journal
The Science and Art of Mining
Coal Magazine
Coal News
Coke and Gas
Master Name Index
What's new in the site
Mining
Mining History
Colliery Index
Colliery Maps
Company Overviews
Who's Who
Mineral Information
Managers Certificates
Educational Material
Bibliography
Statistics
Workers/Employee Lists
Notes for Family Historians
War Service information
Disasters
Disaster Reports
Names of those killed
Disasters in the 1700s
Disasters in the 1800s
Disasters in the 1900s
Memorials
Awards for Gallantry
On this day ...

Links to other sites of interest
Industrial Heritage Days Out
Former www.pitwork.net web site

Index to site

Contact and address details

Share Page with Social Media

Share on Facebook

Share with Reddit

Share on Delicious

Title Prev Page Return to Index Next Page Title
 
 Colliery Engineering October, 1948 

Standardisation

Important steps may be expected in the direction of standardisation of winding drums. For the new coalmines, or major replanning of existing mines, the big hourly outputs will entail net lifts of 5 to 12 tons, and, with the aid of balance ropes in the deeper shafts, high winding efficiency will be attainable in most cases with plain cylindrical drums* employing double or multi-layer coiling for depths over about 1,500 ft., in line with the long-established practice in the metalliferous mines abroad. Thus the way is wide open for a valuable measure of standardisation in winding-drum design and construction. The diameter is by far the most important variant but the great majority of cases, including the smaller service winders, could be covered efficiently by a range of seven diameters varying from 9 to 15 ft. in one-foot increments. For the big coal winders each rope should preferably have its own drum, or its own compartment of a single drum, in order to permit double-layer coiling either initially or later when the shaft is sunk to deeper horizons. Thus, the width of the drum barrels — a minor factor in any case — could be standardised to not more than five sizes, say for 6 ft. in six-inch increments.

For service winders, at any rate, the drives — motors and reduction gear — could be rationalised in say 100 h.p. steps from 400 to 1,000 h.p., the motor speeds and gear ratios being suitably fixed, in relation to the standard range of drum diameters, to give rope velocities of about 20 ft. per sec. for the smaller winders and up to 35 ft. per sec. for the larger.

* See "Electric Winding at Collieries," Worrall. Trans. Inst. Min. E., Vol. C.111.

Drawings and Photographs accompanying the article

 

Prev Page Return to Top of Page Next Page

Article reproduced from a copy of the magazine held at National Mining Museum Scotland, Newtongrange, Midlothian.

 

mail
Mail:
Webmaster
Back
Back
Home
Home
Open Government Licence   Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Copyright © 1999-2024 by The Durham Mining Museum and its contributors
Registered Charity No: 1110608
Page last updated: 17 Jan 2023

Privacy Policy
 
Terms & Conditions
 
Search
Search
Print
Print